Wednesday, May 4, 2011

http://www.oonagardner.com/

i like this website because it is very clean and crisp. The focus is to compliment the work and not on the website look itself. However i not like how this person has there work scrolling horizontally. Its a unique way of setting out the page but i think it could confuse the veiwer.

http://www.mariaocampo.com/

I like the colours used in this site, i think they are not to harsh and the work stands out in front of them. The graphics are a good look for the opening page however having them behind the work is a little distracting.

http://brightlywound.net/main/

Besides the pink underlined links, i think that this website works. the main page seems to be a nice starter to this body of work, the bolded type gives a strong feel while not being overpowering. the background is softly detailed and compliments the pieces nicely.

http://www.scott-pugh.com/

This is another one of those websites that is just the pure work. In my opinion, i think that it is one of the best ways to display your work.

http://www.drewsisk.com/

This is a website that just has a large image of the work. This works, but at the same time is very bland.I do like how the name of The person is in different colours, kind of giving it an element of interest as well.

http://www.wolfegang.co.uk/

I like this website very much. I think that the photography on the home page is an excellent picture, while the light source draws your eyes to the information and directory. I think that having only one colour in the text and the rest shades works perfectly. This website has tremendous balance and works.

http://www.bennyarts.com/

This is a horrible web page in my opinion. its original picture on the home page is so distracting and offputing that the user most probably wouldn't even both on checking the work. This persons work is actually good but his home page is so offputing.

No comments:

Post a Comment